Why We Don’t Rely on Mediation to Resolve Workplace Conflict
- Kate Russell
- Mar 18
- 2 min read
You might be surprised to hear this from a business that specialises in workplace conflict management, but here it is:
We don’t love mediation. At least, not in the way it’s traditionally used in workplace settings.
Let us explain.
The Problem With Mediation in the Workplace
Mediation works beautifully in legal or commercial disputes—scenarios where two parties can trade, negotiate, and walk away with a deal. But workplace conflict is different.
Because work is personal.
We don’t just show up for a pay cheque. We bring our skills, our values, our identity. We want to contribute meaningfully. And how we perform at work affects how we see ourselves—and how we want to be seen by our peers and leaders.
So, when someone is told, “You’ll be attending mediation to sort this out,” it rarely feels neutral. No matter how gently it’s framed, it can land like a performance warning. It feels formal. Legal. Punitive.
And instead of resolving the conflict, it can heighten defensiveness, reduce trust, and push the real issues underground.
Most Workplace Conflicts Aren’t Just About Personalities
Here’s something we see all the time: two people clash, and the assumption is that it’s a personality issue. But more often than not, the root causes run deeper.
Blurred roles and responsibilities. Mismatched expectations. Unspoken power dynamics. Structural issues in how decisions are made or feedback is shared.
Conflict at work is rarely just about who likes who. It’s a signal. One that something in the system—communication, clarity, leadership—isn’t functioning the way it should.
And if we don’t address that system? The conflict comes back. Or it finds new faces.
Our Approach to Conflict Resolution is Co-Creating the Way Forward
At The Huddle, we take a different path. Rather than forcing people into a formal mediation room, we create space for meaningful, forward-focused conversations.
We focus on:
Creating team agreements around how respect and communication will look in practice
Clarifying roles and decision-making authority so expectations are aligned
Facilitating conversations that feel human, not transactional—what we call “meetings,” not mediations
These aren't about blame or scorekeeping. They’re about restoring trust, resetting relationships, and building psychological safety.
Because when people feel heard—not judged—they’re more open to change. More open to each other. And more ready to move forward together.
When Language Shapes Culture
Mediation isn't inherently bad—it’s a powerful tool when used in the right context. But language matters. Culture matters. And in the workplace, the way we handle conflict says a lot about who we are as a team.
That’s why we focus on collaboration, not correction.
We help teams shift from “What went wrong?” to “What do we need moving forward?”
Because that’s where real resolution lives.
Ready to Rethink How You Handle Conflict?
If your team is stuck in cycles of blame or avoidance, a traditional mediation process might not get you where you want to go. But a facilitated, human-centric conversation just might.
Let’s talk about what better could look like. Because work is personal. And conflict resolution should reflect that.
Comments